Friendship resident is finalist in PETA contest
Ashley Frohnert of Friendship
Photo by PETA
Ashley Frohnert wanted to raise awareness when she entered PETA's Sexiest Vegan Next Door 2014 contest. She ended up also raising enough votes to land her among the top 10 women.
Frohnert, 24, of Friendship, has beaten out hundreds of other entrants from across the United States to advance to the contest's final round. Two winners — one female and one male — will each receive a free vacation for two to Maui, Hawaii, courtesy of HumaneTrip.com.
“I'm really shocked and excited,” says Frohnert, who has been meat-free since 2008 and went vegan in the fall of 2013. “I did it to raise awareness in Pittsburgh, but it would be really nice to go to Hawaii!”
Frohnert, who works for TrueFit Innovation in Cranberry, says the decision to go vegan was fueled by a general disgust for the way animals are treated. The killing of male chicks — often by crushing or suffocation — was particularly upsetting, and made the transition to her new lifestyle easy, she says.
Frohnert is the owner of two adopted dogs — Jackson, 2, a coonhound-shepherd mix; and Howard, 5, a mastiff-shepherd mix. She also volunteers with local animal shelters and raised $1,200 for the Western Pennsylvania Humane Society by completing a half-marathon.
She's also hoping to reach out to Mayor Bill Peduto to launch Meatless Mondays in city schools, a movement to get students skipping meat one day a week. She suggests any locals looking to make the switch should check out www.VeganPittsburgh.com for a list of restaurants that offer vegan options.
Voting for the finalists to help PETA determine the winners ends at noon on May 2. Winners will be notified and announced by May 6.
Rachel Weaver is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7948 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.