Art in the Kitchen Tasting Tour visits museum, theater
The Women's Committee of Westmoreland Museum of American Art on Saturday coordinated the 15th annualArt in the Kitchen Tasting Tour.
Cultural locations were the Greensburg museum and Apple Hill Playhouse near Delmont.
Guests got a behind-the-scenes tour of Apple Hill, a pre-Civil War era barn-turned-playhouse bought in 1981 by Pat Beyer, the theater's executive producer. Known as the William Penn Playhouse in the 1950s, Apple Hill offers dramas to comedies May through September.
Vintage props, such as a General Electric refrigerating machine, were used in Apple Hill's stage “kitchen.” Volunteer Adrienne Fischer shared Apple Hill lore, such as the tale of Southern sympathizers who hid the body of a Confederate soldier behind the stone walls in the basement.
At the museum, Sergio Maragni, an instructor at Westmoreland County Community College and operator of Sergio's Menu, which offers catering and cooking lessons, used pinches and dashes of staple ingredients to create battered artichokes and Shrimp Aioli in mere minutes.
Residential hosts were Paul and Linda Bieterman of Greensburg, Ken and Sue White of Unity Township, John and Jackie Frank of Penn Township and Ty and Judy Radcliff of Murrysville, who opened their amazing kitchens for the tour and offered samples of recipes prepared from the Art in the Kitchen cookbook.
Event chairwoman was Marie Gallatin.
Seen: Museum director and CEO Judith O'Toole, Shirleah Kelly, Sally Loughran, Sue Kiren, Susan Tanto, Barbara Ferrier, Susan Ciarimboli, Roxanne Fontanesi, Kathy Hollahan, Lois Kemp, Suzanne Mahady, Susan Piccolo and Sally Rager.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.