Share This Page

Greensburg's One Eleven hosts Holiday Jingle Tails Party

| Sunday, Dec. 16, 2012, 8:56 p.m.
Event organizers, Rita DeBlock,(R), Humane Society of Westmoreland County board member, and Richard Kurtz, owner, One Eleven restaurant, at the Humane Society of Westmoreland County Jingle Tails Party, held at One Eleven in Greensburg on Monday evening, December 10, 2012. Kim Stepinsky | For The Tribune-Review

One Eleven in Greensburg was the site of a Dec. 10 Holiday Jingle Tails Party for the Humane Society of Westmoreland County.

Given the restaurant's soft lighting and intimate seating — not to mention the buffet of warm comfort foods — the evening had the vibe of a congenial gathering of good friends.

Adding a little buzz was the chance to win gift baskets brimming with Christmas treats and treasures, along with a lottery ticket tree to help pay off the holiday shopping sprees.

Party organizer and humane society board member Rita DeBlock gave props to restaurateur Richard Kurtz for repeated willingness to host events that benefit the organization's four-footed and furry “clients.”

Seen at One Eleven: David Volpe and Sean Spadaro, Kerry Luck, Debbie Hill, Char Neiport-Hillman, Rebecca Gardner, Candy Cassidy, John Peck, Mike and Adele Brajdich, Jim Silvis, Tom Grace and Bob and Roxanne Fontanesi.

Also, Steve and Candy Squires, Heather Keber, Debbie Henry, John Kintz and Alex Kintz-Konegger, Angel Mendoza, Georgiana Bodeanu, Teresa Domit and Phyllis Dolan.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.