Out & About: Quilter talks about her craft at art museum luncheon
Southern Alleghenies Museum of Art at Ligonier Valley auxiliary president, Barbara Kravits, (L), of Ligonier, joins speaking artist, Peggy Black, of Jenners Township, Somerset County, during the Lunch a l'Art, held at the Southern Alleghenies Museum of Art at Ligonier Valley on Thursday afternoon, January 17, 2013.
Photo by Kim Stepinsky | For The Tribune-Review
Art quilter Peggy Black was the guest speaker at the year's first Lunch a l'Art program, held Thursday at the Southern Alleghenies Museum of Art at Ligonier Valley.
She started by saying that in her “real life,” she is an accountant, adding, “I'm not a trained artist; I take classes on the Internet.”
That disclaimer seemed irrelevant after the Somerset resident started showing her slides and pulling out examples of her work. The “oohs” and “aahs” from the ladies at lunch were enough to confirm Black's artistic credentials.
Noting that she is not a traditionalist in her approach to quilting, Black discussed her methods, throwing about terms such as monoprint, nature print, stencils and fusable appliques.
She said art quilters “do with a needle what other artists do with a pencil or paint.”
Audience members Kathy Hayes and Barbara Lynne had done just that, arriving in handmade quilted vests of their own design.
Accompanying Black was her friend, Loretta Coleman.
Site coordinator Sommer Toffle worked the lights and helped to set up the props.
Seen at SAMA: Joyce Collins, Peggy Shepler, Sharon Vito-McCue, Helen Thorne, Bonnie Hoffman, Audrey Tostevin, Vernie West, Betty Hamner, Sue Kiren, Margot Reynolds, Joyce Kubanic, Gay Wasserman, Vivian Coombe, Gretchen Griffith and Glenda Dickson.
— Shirley McMarlin
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.