'Being Battle Weary' is topic at NAACP Prayer Breakfast
(From left) Adrienne Russell, the Rev. Dr. Jack Sullivan Jr., Mary Ann Strader and Ruth Tolbert gather at the annual Greensburg-Jeannette NAACP Prayer Breakfast, on Feb. 9, 2013, at the Bishop Connare Center in Greensburg.
Photo by Kim Stepinsky | For The Tribune-Review
“The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective.” So says the biblical Book of James.
Just imagine, then, what can happen when a whole roomful of good people get together for the purpose of prayer.
That was the scene Saturday morning in the Bishop Connare Center east of Greensburg, at the annual Greensburg-Jeannette NAACP Prayer Breakfast.
The first answered prayer was that good weather and dry roads prevailed, by no means a given for a February event, so that travelers arrived unscathed and unstressed.
Never giving up in prayer was the theme of the message, “Being Battle Weary,” given by Mary Ann Strader of Pittsburgh's West End, an associate pastor with Victorious Faith Evangelistic Outreach in Pittsburgh.
Welcoming the crowd was the Rev. Dr. Jack Sullivan Jr. of Greensburg, the newly elected local NAACP branch president and a bishop of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) in Pennsylvania. He was accompanied by his wife, the Rev. Sekinah Hamlin.
Making sure that breakfast ran smoothly wasAdrienne Russell, religious affairs chairwoman for the branch. Melinda McCoy was mistress of ceremonies.
Seen around the tables: Ruth Tolbert, Norma Skillings, the Rev. Carl Jones, Tamara Robinson, Sheila Morman, Dr.Robin Sims, Dorothy Skillings, Lurene Moore, Denise and Jeff Holmes, Yvonne and Stanley Taylor, Jerri Holts, Marilyn Fox Lewis, John V. Jones, Sharon Green, Dr. Janice Allen, Gertrude Allen, Corey Rogers, Jenna Howard and Westmoreland County Commissioner Ted Kopas.
— Shirley McMarlin
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.