Share This Page

Greensburg Garden Center hosts spring tea

| Sunday, April 7, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Kim Stepinsky | for the Tribune-Review
(from left), Greensburg Garden Center publicity chair, Debbie Campbell, event co-chair, Diane Dale, event co-chair and Greensburg Garden Center President, Angela Raitano, and event co-chair and Greensburg Garden Center Vice President, Carla Rusnica, gather at the Greensburg Garden Center's annual spring tea, held at the Greensburg Garden and Civic Center on Saturday afternoon, April 6, 2013.

Warm temperatures, cloudless skies and the fun of Greensburg Garden Center's annual tea on April 6 were sure signs of spring.

Held at Greensburg Garden and Civic Center, club members served guests fresh-brewed tea and homemade chicken and egg salad and cucumber sandwiches at themed tables.

Sandi Kaselonis traveled all the way from Wabash, Ind., “to eat and be with friends.” Kaselonis sat at the “Dogwood Time” table decorated by members of the Cheshamac Garden Club.

Others with Kaselonis were Barbara Cseh, Margie Wolff, Jean Streeter, Lorraine Amma, Connie Hughes and Marion Fulton.

Carla Rusnica was co-chairwoman withAngie Raitano and Diane Dale, and tea makers were Agnes Lapa, Peggy Annas and Pam Turner.

Donna Lee announced the winners of prize drawings, greeter was Jane Petrovich and pianist was Mike Simoncelli.

Seen: Debbie Campbell, Elizabeth Pesci, Donna Burns, Johny DeRose, Nancy Nemeth, Ruth Bobula, Betty Davis, Geneva Markle, Judy Ross, Denise Craine, Jennifer Halle, Louise Muse, Carrie Pike, Lougene Whiteman, Arlene Petroy, Peggy Thiery, Arlis Meyer, Shirley Mills, Terry Depcrymski, Helena Kelly, Betty Hammer, Gloria Wellhoffer, Karen McGivern, Susan Braun, Marlene Elchik, Jane Stape, Dawn Fink, Julia Snyder, Barbara Iwaniec and Carol Brown.

— Dawn Law

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.