Pressley Ridge, Union Mission among winners of Innovations awards
The annual Innovations dinner and awards program of Mental Health America of Westmoreland County was subtitled “A night to celebrate visionaries in promoting mental health.”
The event took place May 9 at the Ramada Hotel and Conference Center east of Greensburg.
This year's visionaries included:
• Pressley Ridge, recipient of the Prevention Award, for services to youth with challenging behaviors that help to keep children and families together. Accepting was CEO Susanne Cole.
• Union Mission, recipient of the Recovery Award, for services to homeless men including education, employment, behavior modification and counseling. Accepting was Executive Director Dan Carney.
• Matt Zamosky, recipient of the Education Award, for diligent efforts as director of the Westmoreland County Veterans Affairs Office to secure benefits for veterans and increase the visibility of the office.
• Erika Beras, recipient of the Media Excellence Award, for commitment to increasing awareness of regional behavioral health issues as a reporter for public radio station 90.5 WESA and member of advisory boards.
Welcoming about 175 attendees was MHA board president Paul Niemiec. Announcing winners was the face of Excela Health, Jennifer Miele.
Josie Funari, Debbie Ramsay and Molly Robb Shimko chaired the event committee.
Seen at dinner: MHA Executive Director Laurie Barnett Levine, Richard and Joanna Stillwagon, Vikki Ridenour, Dick and Barbara Flock, Jim Bendel, Ray Grabowski, Dave Delisi, Brad and Mira Funari, Wendy Zamosky, Norita Zamosky, Susan Matthews, Scott Brown and Donna Gallagher.
Also, Ken Shimko, Scot Thomas, Richard and Debbie Peltier, Tonia Richardson, Rachelle Shea, Kelly Weimer, Monica Ploskon, Kris Smith, Krista Boyer, Ryann Bradley, Theresa Matson, Duane Slade, Carolyn Albert, Michelle Christopher, Pam Fisher and Brandy Campbell.
— Shirley McMarlin
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.