Out & About: Westmoreland Museum of American Art's 'Wrecking Ball'
The Westmoreland Museum of American Art, a Greensburg landmark for decades, is known for its extensive collection and fine exhibitions.
But on July 13, with graffiti, black lights, doors and windows flung open and walls whacked by sledgehammers, it was absent its usual polish.
“We're doing everything you're not supposed to do in a museum,” director and CEO Judy O'Toole said. “Let's just break loose and have some fun.”
More than 300 were expected to attend the Wrecking Ball, the final function to be held at the building as it closes for two years for expansion and renovation. Operations will continue at Westmoreland @rt 30, in the former Stickley, Audi & Co. furniture building in Unity.
O'Toole commended museum staff for their months of preparation for the move and for making the party a smashing success.
“We are very excited to be at this point,” she said. “It's the beginning of the future.”
O'Toole wore a hard hat and earrings dangling with tiny tools. Amy Baldonieri, associate director for development and finance, sported a tool belt and work boots and jeans. Ginnie Leiner, membership and development coordinator, fashioned a floppy bow for her hair from construction tape.
Seen: Tom and Susan Tanto, with their daughter, Jamie, Harley Trice, Terry Graft and Linda Brown, George and Nancy Stewart, Bud and Patti Gibbons, Rebecca Sexton, Brian McCall, Jim Bendel, Karl and Carmen Eisaman, Richard McCormick, Gene James, Rich and Jennifer Tinsman, Bob and Sharyn Sekora, Joanna Moyar, Linda Earnest and Margaret DiVirgilio.
— Dawn Law
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.