Mental Health America of Westmoreland salutes Funari family
Mental Health America of Westmoreland celebrated 50 years and a founding family Oct. 24 at the Ramada Hotel and Conference Center in Hempfield.
Josie Funari and her son Brad accepted the first lifetime achievement award given by MHA of Westmoreland. The Funari family was lauded for its role as advocates for mental health care and services. The legacy began with patriarch Fred J. Funari, who was involved in founding MHA in Westmoreland in 1964. He founded out-patient clinics and served on the board in the 1960s.Funari's son, Chip Funari, died in June 2012. Josie, a MHA board member who began volunteering for the organization in the 1960s, met her husband-to-be at a MHA fundraiser in 1970.
The Funaris were presented the award by their friends, Richard and Joanna Stillwagon, who were introduced by Dr. Paul Niemiec, MHA of Westmoreland board president.
Also with the family was Chip's daughter, Jenny Anderson; his sister, Carol, and her husband, Dennis Radkowski; Brad's wife, Mira Funari; Dr. Christopher Radkowski and Kevin and Bobbe Jo Radkowski.
Keynote speaker Dr.David Shern, interim president and CEO of MHA, talked about national changes in medical care,improvements in science and the integration of mental health care with medical care.
“We stand on the shoulders of giants; this is our chance to get it right,” Shern said.
Seen: Barbara Flock, Eric and Michele Bononi, Chris Feliciani, Dave Delisi, James and Judy Modecki, Tony Marsili, Mary Ellen Tiberio, Arnold and Laurie Barnett Levine, Rebecca Valeri and Ron Weaver.
— Dawn Law
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.