Conservator speaks at SAMA's Lunch a l'Art
Artist and art conservator Jeffrey Rouse was the guest speaker during Lunch a l'Art on April 17 in the Southern Alleghenies Museum of Art at Ligonier Valley.
At the outset, the New Alexandria resident said his talk would cover “where I'm coming from and where I'm going to,” which ended up including insight into an emotional and spiritual journey that has drawn him to work as a restorer of churches and religious iconography.
He also showed pieces from work in progress, a 40-piece study of Linn Run titled “A Walk in the Woods.” He characterized his current painting style as “deep interior, wooded impressionism.”
Special guest was Greensburg Salem High School senior Anastazia Byerly-Bleyer, whose acrylic-on-fiberglass painting “Falcon in Gdansk” was part of the museum's annual “Artists of the 21st Century: Student Art Exhibition.”
Members of the SAMA-LV auxiliary chose the painting, which the young artist created from a photo she took while traveling in Poland, as tops among works submitted by high school juniors and seniors for the recent show. Votes were solicited during lunch for overall favorite piece from all of the student artists, with results to be announced at a later date.
Byerly-Bleyer was accompanied by GSHS art teacher Kelley Audia.
Site coordinator Sommer Toffle welcomed guests.
On the lunch list: Ann Macdonald, Helen Thorne, Vernie West, Peggy Shepler, Susan Endersbe, Bonnie Hoffman, Madelon Sheedy, Susan Kiren, Margot Reynolds, Anita Manoli, Barbara Kravits, Sharon Vito-McCue, Terry Coyne, Mary Clark, Gretchen Griffith, Carolyn Turner, Betty Lou Rubenstein and Kathy Valencia.
— Shirley McMarlin
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.