Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Derby Day for a Cure
Kentucky has the original Derby, but Western Pennsylvania places with Derby Day for a Cure.
The second annual event to benefit the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society took place May 3 at scenic Oak Lodge near Stahlstown.
The event had the requisite derbys trappings, like colorfully dressed attendees sipping mint juleps along Millionaire's Row.
It also had the cutest special guest in Nicholas Sosko, a Unity first-grader who is in remission from Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Sharing his place in the winner's circle were parents Nick and Linda Sosko and sister Madelyn.
Something not found in Kentucky was an auction item offering a chance to share a day with Westmoreland County Commissioner Chuck Anderson(seen with Nancy), along with an Italian dinner for eight at one of the DeNunzio's restaurants. That tops a hot brown any day!
Another highlight was the best hat contest, with first place going to Diane Harshberger, second to Joanne Hanley and third to Raymond Shields.
Cheers went to event chairwoman Jo Rossi, along with committee members June Anton, Wendy Anton, Sharon Crawford, Donna Detore, Dee Gano, Nancy Heider, Debra Honkus, Kim Kramer, Deb Louchheim, Nancy Lynch, Lisa Spitzer, Lynn Stano and Jane Walters, and LLS staffers Jeanne Caliguiri and Jennifer Steinsdoerfer.
Seen: Jim Rossi, Don Kramer, David Heider, Jim and Lynn Beck, Mark Spitzer, Pat Wallace and Kim Dickert Wallace, Matt Hanley, Terry Graft and Linda Brown, George Shaner and Michael Philopena, Ron and Barb Hopkins, Rick and Joyce Versaw, Ericand Michele Bononi, John and Debbie Wohlin, Erica Shaffer, Brenda Shaffer, Jacque Bell, Ivy Kalmut, Ted and Arlene Wohlin, Tom and Karen Kohut, Donna Henderson, Dr. David and Valerie Kenney, Mary Louise Stoughton, Tresa McVicker, Chad and Melissa Kalp with Hannah, Julie Alakson and Missy Moore.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.