Masque*ology by Beauty Architect Revitalizing Eye Gel Mask
The claim: Masque*ology by Beauty Architect Revitalizing Eye Gel Mask is a synthetic-mesh single-use, under-eye mask saturated with advanced revitalizing ingredients that creates a gel-like texture that contours to your eye area, leaving them refreshed. Key ingredients include hydrolyzed collagen to improve the elasticity of the skin and collagen production; caviar to nourish skin cells; pearl powder to prevent pigmentation and renew skin cells; and algae for detoxification. Masque*ology reduces puffiness and helps brighten and refresh the under-eye area.
Cost: $24 for a pack of three
Where: Select Sephora stores and www.sephora.com
These are slippery little buggers. Getting them into the right position is a bit tricky, although a little practice helps. The lightweight gel mesh slides easily and coolly upon the skin, It's a refreshing sensation after a toss-and-turn night. The mask does not dry out like many do. This one remains wet. In fact, the instructions suggest dabbing more of the gel under the eye area for added benefit.
I learned it's best to spend the 20 minutes of treatment in a more prone position, keeping the mask from sliding down toward the cheekbones and away from the eye area. And, isn' that the best way to recreate a spa experience? Just relax, and let the puffiness disappear.
I have chronic dark circles under my eyes that I attribute to lack of sleep, fair skin, allergies and genetics. (Thanks, Mom!) All or none of those theories may be rooted in fact. Anyway, I'm constantly trying creams, potions, tonics and serums to refresh that area.
I've never tried eye masks until these from Masque*ology. I'll confess to being a bit squeamish at the thought of putting caviar and algae — two of the ingredients — on my face, but if that was the price for perkier peepers, I was all for it.
I wasn't disappointed. In addition to smoother skin, I noticed less puffiness around my eyes, which, generally, seemed brighter to me. After I put on a light coat of foundation, the rejuvenation was even more apparent.
At $24 for three masks, these treatments will be a luxury more than a habit, but the 20 minutes that the mask takes to work is great for mental revitalization, as well. That's certainly an unintended, yet welcome, perk!
Someone first commented on the blue tint under my eyes when I was, oh, maybe 4 years old. Thanks to my skin tone, I don't need runny mascara to have raccoon eyes on bad days. And, as my favorite under-eye gel was discontinued, I was eager to try Masque*ology by Beauty Architect's Revitalizing Eye Gel Mask.
After all, something you don't have to apply every day means less time and thought involved. But I didn't expect it to be so slippery just out of the pouch, and, first, almost dropped it on the sink, and then had it slide about until I got it properly positioned. The second and third steps in the instructions were easier, relax for 20 minutes, and remove.
I noticed it was tingly, to the point that I expected it to be red when I took it off. That wasn't the case, though, and while I can't say my eyes were less puffy, there was less blue, which lasted for about a day and a half. I might not use these on a regular basis, but if I needed to look my best for a special occasion, the gel masks would be a good choice.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers’ Roethlisberger hurting after big hit
- Official: Suspect identified in police ambush
- Steelers’ Brown combats disruptive defensive ploys
- Former Pirates pitcher Tekulve doing well after heart transplant
- Windber man pleads to stealing from church’s African fund
- New approach on offense has Pirates in playoff contention this season
- Pennsylvania fiscal officers say budget in dire situation
- Utah man admits role in plan to ship 239 pounds of marijuana out of New Castle
- Crosby appreciates his relationship with Penguins fans
- Steelers veteran defenders want young teammates to step up
- Pitt football coach Chryst refutes analyst Wannstedt’s opinion