ShareThis Page

Ohio River lock failure halts traffic downstream from Pittsburgh

| Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2016, 1:48 p.m.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
New Cumberland Locks and Dam in Jefferson County, Ohio

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has halted traffic around an Ohio River lock and dam because the hydraulic system that operates the lock's gates and valves failed.

Staff at the New Cumberland Locks and Dam in Ohio's Jefferson County, about 54 miles downstream of Pittsburgh, discovered the problem Monday after noticing a sheen inside the facility's main lock chamber. The Army Corps determined that 150 gallons of hydraulic fluid had leaked from an underwater line.

“The closure effectively stops navigation on the Ohio River upstream and downstream of the lock, creating a backlog of commercial vessels awaiting passage,” Army Corps spokesman Jeff Hawk said.

When officials shut down the facility, two vessels had been waiting to pass through and 10 more were on their way, Hawk said.

Hawk said the lock will be out of service for at least the next few days while the Army Corps comes up with a short-term solution.

“A more long-term fix could be several months away,” Hawk said.

An average of 320 commercial vessels pass through New Cumberland each month, along with another 120 pleasure craft during summer months, according to the Army Corps.

The Army Corps typically schedules closures for construction and maintenance work on locks and dams at least two years in advance to give companies time to alter shipping arrangements. Unscheduled closures such as New Cumberland's can wreak havoc and be costly for towing companies operating on the river and for companies awaiting shipments of needed supplies, said Mary Ann Bucci, executive director of the Port of Pittsburgh Commission.

“These unscheduled closures are so devastating,” Bucci said.

Federal data show New Cumberland experienced 15 unscheduled closures last year that placed the facility out of service for more than 45 hours combined, its lowest out-of-service time in five years. In 2014, 26 closures of New Cumberland resulted in nearly 1,800 hours of downtime, data show.

New Cumberland, which opened in 1961, includes main and auxiliary locks. The Army Corps closed the auxiliary lock two years ago because of structural problems. The larger main lock is 1,200 feet long and 110 feet wide. The faulty hydraulic line is the same one that was installed in the late 1950s during the facility's construction, Hawk said.

He said most of the leaked hydraulic fluid was contained to the main chamber, but a small amount escaped into the river. Crews used containment booms to absorb the escaped fluid.

Locks and dams in the Pittsburgh area are among the oldest in the nation.

Many were built in the 1920s and 1930s, making the New Cumberland facility somewhat newer by comparison. Congress has long delayed the billions of dollars needed to repair and upgrade the Emsworth, Dashields and Montgomery locks and dams on the Upper Ohio River.

Tom Fontaine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7847 or tfontaine@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.