ShareThis Page

Tom Ridge wants USPS to improve screening for opioids in overseas shipments

| Wednesday, Feb. 8, 2017, 5:48 p.m.
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge addresses the audience on the topic of cybersecurity during a daylong conference at Carnegie Mellon University on Monday, Feb. 1, 2016, to discuss better coordinating the city’s role in fighting computer crimes on a national and international scale.
Submitted | Pine Creek Journal
Tom Ridge

Former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge, the nation's first Homeland Security secretary, is calling on the federal government to eliminate a loophole that he says has created a pipeline for opioids to be shipped illegally to the United States.

“I'm beyond surprised that they wouldn't take a more aggressive approach to this,” said Ridge, a senior adviser for the Washington-based nonprofit Americans for Securing All Packages.

Some of the most dangerous synthetic opioids flooding American communities — including the elephant tranquilizer carfentanil, which authorities recently linked to two overdose deaths in Beaver County — are being made in foreign laboratories in China and elsewhere.

It's unknown where the deadly drugs in the Beaver County cases originated. Beaver County District Attorney David Lozier, who is overseeing an investigation, did not return a message.

Americans for Securing All Packages supporters include UPS and FedEx, private companies that Ridge said already adhere to more stringent regulations such as including advance electronic security data with U.S.-bound packages from abroad. The information — required to be provided under a 2002 law — serves as a shipping manifest of sorts and includes the shipper and recipient names and addresses, a general description of the package's contents, its weight and how many pieces it contains.

Authorities can then “use algorithms to more effectively target high-risk packages and stop dangerous items before they get to the country,” Ridge said.

“The private sector, working with law enforcement, successfully implemented an advanced electronic security data system more than 15 years ago, and the same should be expected of a government agency who handles the bulk of all packages being brought into the United States,” said UPS spokeswoman Kara Ross.

Ridge said the U.S. Postal Service and foreign postal services haven't followed suit in providing the advance data, nor were they required to do so under the 2002 law. As a result, about 340 million packages pour into the United States annually without any of the advance data — far too many for U.S. authorities to physically screen.

A Postal Service spokesman did not return a message.

Ridge said he is optimistic that lawmakers in Washington will soon introduce legislation to change that. Related bills proposed last fall in the House and Senate went nowhere. U.S. Reps. Keith Rothfus, R-Sewickley, and Mike Kelly, R-Butler, of Western Pennsylvania co-sponsored the House version.

“The opioid crisis is tearing apart the fabric of our communities and our families. With this bill, we can strengthen postal security against drug traffickers and safeguard more people from these dangerous drugs,” Kelly said in a statement. He again intends to be a co-sponsor of the bill when it is reintroduced.

Tom Fontaine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7847 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.