Pittsburgh doesn't release police camera video
Pittsburgh police policy prohibits the department from releasing body-worn camera footage even after a case is closed and there is great public interest, public safety officials said Wednesday.
Police on Tuesday night released security camera footage of a Jan. 8 confrontation between Steelers assistant coach Joey Porter and Officer Paul Abel. Police did not release the footage from Abel's body camera, which he wrote in the original affidavit he activated partway through the scuffle and arrest.
“We will not be releasing Officer Abel's (body-worn camera) footage due to policies that prohibit us from releasing it,” Public Safety spokeswoman Emily Schaffer said in an email.
The department's policies and procedures are not publicly available, and police officials would not detail the portion of the body camera policy that prohibits them from releasing the video.
Robert Swartzwelder, president of Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1, agreed with the bureau's decision.
“No need to release the video at this time,” he said Wednesday. “The district attorney made his charging decision. Therefore, the video serves no purpose other than to create controversy or develop animosity between a law enforcement agency and the district attorney.”
He called it an excellent decision by police Chief Scott Schubert.
Porter originally was charged with aggravated assault, simple assault, resisting arrest, defiant trespass, disorderly conduct and public drunkenness, but prosecutors dropped the most serious charges. On Tuesday, Porter pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct and agreed to pay a $300 fine.
Mayor Bill Peduto said he would prefer to be as transparent as possible but noted that the state has not yet passed a law that would void Pennsylvania's wire tap law, which prohibits audio recording inside a private home.
He said he would need to study what law enforcement agencies around the country do before he would be comfortable with a blanket policy.
“I'm always for pushing the amount of information as far as we can and providing as much information back to the public about what happens in government,” he said. “At the same time, I don't want to say something that jeopardizes cases or puts officers in situations where they then could be viewed negatively either before the courts or before the public.”
Mike Manko, spokesman for Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr., said his office is constrained by state law. Under the Criminal Information Records Act, he said, the district attorney's office can't disseminate evidence that wasn't introduced in open court.
Police officials in August gave a public synopsis of the bureau's body cam policy — the first public glimpse of the policy. At the time, a spokeswoman laid out a list of requirements and guidelines officers with cameras must follow, including that officers do not use the cameras until they have been trained.
When safe to do so, officers will record:
• Traffic and criminal enforcement stops.
• In-progress vehicle and crimes code violations.
• Police vehicle pursuits;.
• Fatal crashes or major crime scenes.
• DUI stops and standardized field sobriety tests.
• Obtaining consent to search.
Officers can use the cameras while performing official duties, including on-duty work or while working authorized secondary employment details.
Abel was working a secondary employment security detail the night of his scuffle with Porter. Supervisors can view the recordings on a random basis, and video that isn't valuable to an investigation is deleted after 90 days.
Staff writer Bob Bauder contributed. Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.