ShareThis Page

Keystone Oaks teacher strike averted

| Thursday, March 30, 2017, 7:51 a.m.
The Keystone Oaks Education Association and district officials reached an agreement in last-minute negotiations to avoid a strike Thursday, March 30, 2017.
WPXI
The Keystone Oaks Education Association and district officials reached an agreement in last-minute negotiations to avoid a strike Thursday, March 30, 2017.

The Keystone Oaks Education Association and district officials reached an agreement in last-minute negotiations to avoid a strike Thursday.

On Monday, the KOEA gave a 48-hour notice to the school district of its intent to strike, according to a news release on the school's website.

District officials met with the KOEA on Tuesday and resumed talks Wednesday in an attempt to prevent the strike. Negotiators said they didn't plan on leaving until a fair contract is signed.

Both parties had until midnight to reach an agreement, but a spokesperson for the teachers said they would continue negotiating past that time if the conversations continued to progress.

The tentative agreement was reached about 1 a.m. Thursday.

WPXI-TV's Jennifer Tomazic reported that the agreement is a one-year extension of the contract that expired in June.

With band trips, musicals and other school activities around the corner, students said Wednesday they couldn't help but worry.

"I don't think anyone really saw this coming from a mile away," said freshman Vincent Jackson.

Jeff DiGiacomo, who has four children in the district, said he is in support of teachers getting a fair contract.

"We want them to get a fair contract. Nobody wants a strike. Nobody wants any of the kids to miss any classes or anything like that. We're just here to show our support and hope they come out with a deal tonight," DiGiacomo said Wednesday.

Teachers had been in talks with the district since July.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.