ShareThis Page

Cranberry firm to pay $2M in false advertising lawsuit

| Thursday, April 20, 2017, 8:57 p.m.

A Butler County company has agreed to pay $2 million and quit claiming that its weight-loss system allows people to lose pounds until it has scientific evidence to back it up, according to court documents filed Thursday in Pittsburgh federal court.

The Federal Trade Commission filed a false advertising lawsuit against NutriMost LLC of Cranberry and its owner, Raymond Wisniewski, along with a proposed $32 million judgment. The agency agreed to suspend $30 million of the judgment unless it discovers the company provided false financial information.

U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer approved the order.

The company disagrees with the FTC's claims but is pleased it worked out an agreement, NutriMost said in a prepared statement.

“NutriMost is currently in negotiations with a contract research organization to perform a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that will support future program claims,” the company said.

NutriMost, which markets its $1,895 system nationwide, fails to tell consumers that its “breakthrough technology” is untested, its testimonials frequently come from employees and franchise owners and that the success of its system depends on customers following a 500-calorie diet, the lawsuit says.

The company claims its technology will “reset” customers' metabolism and allow them to burn 2,000 to 7,000 calories of fat per day, causing them to lose 20 to 40 pounds in 40 days without having to follow a restrictive diet, the lawsuit says.

The company has no scientific studies to support its claims and when someone buys the product, the manual explains that the system requires them to “follow a very low-calorie diet of about 500 calories a day for more than 40 days, and requires users to follow certain rules about the types of foods they can consume, and when such foods can and cannot be consumed,” the lawsuit says.

In October 2014, the company started requiring customers to sign an agreement that they would have to pay $35,999 to NutriMost if they posted negative comments online or with the Better Business Bureau, regardless of whether the comments are true, the lawsuit says.

As part of the order, the company has agreed to remove that provision from its contract.

Brian Bowling is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-1218, bbowling@tribweb.com or via Twitter @TribBrian.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.