ShareThis Page

Presidential election may have swayed women's choice of contraception, Pitt survey shows

| Wednesday, May 17, 2017, 9:45 a.m.
AFP/Getty Images
President Donald Trump

The Trump era could be influencing women's birth control choices, according to a University of Pittsburgh survey published Wednesday.

Researchers surveyed 2,158 women since mid-January and found 42 percent have become worried about contraception access since the 2016 presidential election.

About 10 percent of women began a new method of birth control after the election, and 5.3 percent had obtained a long-acting reversible contraception option, such as an intrauterine device.

Of those women switching options, 65 percent said the election influenced their decision “a great deal.”

Pitt's Center for Women's Health Research and Innovation conducted the survey. The center published results online in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.

“Citing concerns for increased costs and restricted insurance coverage, women advocated for contraceptive methods that would outlast an administration perceived to be hostile to reproductive health, and news media outlets amplified these concerns,” the authors wrote.

Dr. Sonya Borrero, director of the women's health research center and Pitt medical student Colleen Judge, developed an anonymous online survey to note changes women made in contraceptive methods and concerns about future access to birth control. The survey targeted Facebook advertising to reach American women between ages 15 to 44.

Half of the women surveyed identified themselves as Democrats, 36 percent as Republican and 13 percent as Independent. The remaining 1 percent did not list a political affiliation.

“Political party affiliation was associated with concerns about future access to contraception and method changes,” Borrero said in a news release Wednesday. “While this study cannot be generalized to all reproductive-aged women in the United States, it does reinforce the anecdotal evidence of fear-based contraception decision-making following the 2016 election. It remains just as important as ever that physicians provide counseling for their patients to make sure they are using the contraception option most appropriate for them.”

Ben Schmitt is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7991, bschmitt@tribweb.com or via Twitter at @Bencschmitt.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.