ShareThis Page

Bill to require lead testing for children to be reviewed Tuesday

| Friday, May 19, 2017, 12:48 p.m.
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
After lead problems in Flint, Mich., and at Summit Elementary School in Butler County and Colfax Elementary in Springdale, state lawmakers again are proposing legislation that would require public schools to test their drinking water for lead annually. Allegheny County is considering a proposal that would require all young children in the county to be tested for lead.

Allegheny County Council is scheduled to review legislation Tuesday that, if it's ultimately approved, would require all children in the county to undergo a blood test to determine the amount of lead in their systems.

The county's Board of Health voted unanimously to recommend the proposal , requiring all children to be tested at ages 1 and 2. Children designated as “high risk” would undergo annual testing from ages 1 to 6.

Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald sponsored the measure, which has been in the works for more than a year.

The legislation includes exceptions for parents who decline the testing for religious or moral reasons, or if the screening is detrimental to the health of the child.

It also includes no enforcement measures, said Dr. Karen Hacker, executive director of the Allegheny County Health Department.

The meeting will be held at 5 p.m. Tuesday in the Allegheny County Courthouse's Gold Room.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, tclift@tribweb.com or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.