ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh Marathon in talks to take over Richard S. Caliguiri Great Race

| Friday, May 19, 2017, 11:00 p.m.
Philip G. Pavely | Trib Total Media
Runners in the Great Race head down Forbes Avenue in Squirrel Hill on Sunday, Sept. 27, 2015.
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Runners fill Beechwood Boulevard in Squirrel Hill at the start of The Great Race on Sunday, Sept. 25, 2016.

Organizers of the Pittsburgh Marathon are in the running to take over the Richard S. Caliguiri City of Pittsburgh Great Race, officials said Friday.

Pittsburgh in March issued a public request for proposals seeking companies to replace the city Parks and Recreation Department as organizer of the Great Race, held each fall in memory of late Mayor Richard Caliguiri. The management change is unrelated to a city investigation of parks expenditures, including Great Race funds, said Katie O'Malley, spokesman for Mayor Bill Peduto.

The city has selected a company and is talking with nonprofit Pittsburgh Three Rivers Marathon, Inc., but has yet to award the contract, O'Malley and a marathon official said.

“We are in discussion with the city about the Great Race, but nothing has been finalized,” said marathon spokeswoman Kelsey Emch, noting that the marathon has managed the Great Race Expo since 2014. The Expo, held the day before the race, includes free product sampling, health screenings, demonstrations and discounted sporting goods sales, according to its website.

O'Malley said she could not identify the city's selection until the management contract is finalized. It is subject to City Council approval and review by the Equal Opportunity Review Commission, she said.

Peduto last week said a parks employee notified his office about a potential problem with the Special Parks Programs Trust Fund, which collects money to put into the Great Race and currently totals $658,220. He said the Office of Municipal Investigations is reviewing the matter.

O'Malley said the investigation centers on expenditures and whether they were properly authorized. She said the investigation will not impact this year's race, scheduled for Sept. 24.

The city generates race funds through sponsorships and registration fees.

The parks department spent $343,326 from the fund in 2016. At least 40 percent of that paid for expenses other than the Great Race , according to invoices.

The expenses included paying for a clown to appear at park events, repairs to the Westwood swimming pool and rental of a tree stump grinder and backhoe for Frick Park. The trust fund also helped pay for city bicentennial events, a Black History Month celebration and a victory parade for the Penguins after the team won the Stanley Cup Championship in 2016.

OMI also is reviewing a Huntington Bank account held by South Side-based City Source Associates that contained Great Race funds. The account was closed in April and a balance of $422,223 was transferred to the special parks trust fund.

O'Malley cited the OMI investigation in declining to discuss the account and why it was held by City Source, a city property maintenance contractor. City Source did not return a call.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312, bbauder@tribweb.com or @bobbauder. Staff Writer Chris Togneri contributed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.