Allegheny County selects longest bus rapid transit route option
Allegheny County officials selected the longest bus rapid transit route to pursue, the Port Authority of Allegheny County announced Wednesday.
The route would connect Downtown with Oakland, East Liberty, Homewood and Wilkinsburg via dedicated bus lanes on Forbes and Fifth avenues.
The chosen route also includes branches through Shadyside, East Liberty and Highland Park. The branches would not have dedicated lanes but would allow BRT buses to get through traffic lights before regular traffic.
Officials estimate the capital cost will be $233 million, mostly to build transit stations and buy buses.
The plan is for half of the cost to be covered by federal grants and the other half to come from state and local funds, said Jim Ritchie, a Port Authority spokesman.
The Federal Transit Administration's Small Starts grant program is among the funding options, Ritchie said.
Small Starts falls under the highly competitive federal Capital Investment Grant program. Projects must go through a multi-year, multi-step process to be eligible for funds, Steven Taubenkibel, an FTA spokesman, has said.
The authority plans to perform environmental and engineering work over the summer and submit the project for federal funding in the fall, the release said.
The goal is to connect Downtown and Oakland with a high-speed mass transit system, since the two are not served by the authority's light-rail system.
The route would connect more than 30,000 people across 24 neighborhoods, the release said.
Officials said they hope the system will be under construction within the next 16 months and operational by 2021.
The authority received more than 2,500 public comments on the project in March and April, the release said.
Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, email@example.com or Twitter @tclift.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.