ShareThis Page

Fontana lead line replacement bills move forward in Harrisburg

Theresa Clift
| Monday, June 19, 2017, 4:27 p.m.
Pennsylvania Sen. Wayne Fontana
Office of Pennsylvania Sen. Wayne Fontana
Pennsylvania Sen. Wayne Fontana

A package of bills state Sen. Wayne Fontana introduced to try to address Pittsburgh's lead crisis moved forward Monday in Harrisburg.

Two Senate committees voted unanimously Monday to approve the three bills, said Brittany Mekilo, Fontana's policy director.

SB 639 would amend the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority Act to allow municipalities to use state PennVEST funds to repair or replace the privately owned portions of sewer and water lines.

SB 656 makes clear that water systems like PWSA are indeed allowed to replace the privately owned portions of water and sewer lines.

When Fontana, D-Brookline, introduced the bills, PWSA officials were saying the authority could replace only the publicly-owned portions of lead lines because of a 2011 Commonwealth Court ruling, and began a partial replacement program. Earlier this month, PWSA suspended its partial lead line replacment program after lead was found in water samples taken from homes where lines had been partially replaced.

Pittsburgh City Council is set to consider legislation that would direct PWSA to replace the entirety of the lead lines, with homeowner approval, in cases when it is already replacing the publicly owned side.

PWSA supports that measure.

The third bill, SB 334, is the same as SB 656, but applies to sewer lines, Mekilo said.

The bills should be going to the Senate Appropriations Committee on Tuesday, Mekilo said.

PWSA is the second-largest water system in the country exceeding a federal lead threshold. It has been exceeding the threshold for nearly a year, with new test results due out this month.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.