ShareThis Page

Police: Penn Hills woman lights boyfriend on fire, puts out flames with urine

| Monday, July 10, 2017, 7:39 p.m.
Dillon Carr | Tribune-Review
A mattress and box spring await trash pickup outside the residence on Lime Hollow Road in Penn Hills where police say a woman set her boyfriend on fire and doused the flames with buckets of urine on July 8.
Leigh Ann Sepelyak, 38, faces charges including attempted homicide, aggravated assault and arson.

A Penn Hills woman is charged with attempted homicide and arson after she allegedly doused her boyfriend with gasoline and lit him on fire, then poured urine on him to put out the flames, police said.

Penn Hills police Chief Howard Burton said the couple had an argument in the basement of a home on Lime Hollow Road Saturday evening.

After the man, Grady Spencer III, fell asleep, his girlfriend, Leigh Ann Sepelyak, 38, poured gas on him, lit a cigarette and lit him on fire. She attempted to douse the flames with a bucket of urine that the couple used as a toilet, police said.

“I can't see how that's an accident when it happens at 4:40 a.m. and the gas was 25 to 30 feet away from the bed. It had to be carried,” Burton said.

Police were called by UPMC Mercy Hospital doctors after the man was taken there by Sepelyak's parents, who live on the main floor of the house where the incident took place, Burton said.

“The parents, when they heard screaming and smelled the smoke, helped put him out -- I think with the same urine -- and went to the hospital. They never called the police, the hospital called,” he said.

Burton said 25 to 35 percent of the man's lower body is burned but he was recovering.

“I'm sure it was more than first-(degree burns),” Burton said.

He said the house was not damaged by the fire.

According to court records, Sepelyak was unable to post bail and is being held at the Allegheny County Jail.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.