ShareThis Page

Keystone Oaks teachers union: Tentative contract reached

Emily Balser
| Wednesday, Aug. 16, 2017, 11:36 p.m.

The Keystone Oaks teachers union announced on its Facebook page Wednesday night a tentative agreement had been reached for a new contract.

The Keystone Oaks Education Association served notice to the school district late Tuesday that it intended to strike Aug. 24 — the first day of classes for students — unless negotiators were able to settle a new contract.

The union posted on its Facebook page Wednesday that, "The strike has been averted! A tentative agreement has been reached. Details will be released after both sides vote on Tuesday! KOEA CARES!"

A phone call and email to school board President Matthew Cesario late Wednesday were not immediately returned.

According to information on the school district's website, the teachers' most recent contract expired June 30 after the two sides in April approved a one-year extension, retroactive to July 1, 2016.

The district, just outside Pittsburgh, includes the communities of Castle Shannon, Dormont and Green Tree.

According to the district, the teachers union has about 160 members.

Staff writer Jeff Himler contributed. Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4680, emilybalser@tribweb.com or via Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.