ShareThis Page

Warrant issued for suspect in Penn Hills homicide

Dillon Carr
| Wednesday, Sept. 27, 2017, 3:18 p.m.
Getty Images
Steven Sparrow, 20, is wanted in the Sept. 2 killing of Andre Williams in Penn Hills.
Steven Sparrow, 20, is wanted in the Sept. 2 killing of Andre Williams in Penn Hills.

The Allegheny County Homicide Unit last week was still searching for an armed and dangerous fugitive who allegedly shot and killed a Baldwin man over Labor Day weekend.

The county has an arrest warrant for 20-year-old Steven Sparrow, no address available. He was charged with criminal homicide, robbery and illegal possession of a firearm.

“He is currently a fugitive from justice and should be considered armed and dangerous,” a county press release said. Police were not immediately available to comment.

Andre Williams, 26, of Baldwin was found with a gunshot wound to his forehead by a Penn Hills officer at Lincoln Road and Vine Street on Sept. 2. He died the following day at UPMC Mercy.

The responding officer, Lt. Roger Meyers of Penn Hills, said he saw a car flee from Mark Drive on the night of the shooting and believed the incident was drug-related.

Anyone with information on Sparrow's whereabouts should call the homicide unit at 412-473-3000. Tips can remain anonymous.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, dcarr@tribweb.com or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.