ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Pa. Supreme Court agrees to hear Pittsburgh police union contract appeal

Bob Bauder
| Tuesday, March 13, 2018, 4:21 p.m.
People walk by the Pennsylvania Judicial Center on Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2015, at the state Capitol in Harrisburg.
Associated Press
People walk by the Pennsylvania Judicial Center on Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2015, at the state Capitol in Harrisburg.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear a Pittsburgh police union's appeal of a contract awarded through arbitration in 2016.

Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1 has been appealing an arbitration panel's contract award for two years, contending it does not conform to the city's Act 47 financial recovery plan.

Union President Robert Swartzwelder said arbitrators acted in bad faith by denying the union's request for provisions that were awarded to other city employee unions in separate bargaining negotiations.

He said that includes provisions for overtime pay and how pensions are calculated. Police pensions are based on salaries. Pensions for other city employees include overtime pay, he said. Police receive overtime only after surpassing a 40-hour work week, he said. Others are paid a premium rate after working eight hours in a day.

“This is no reflection on those unions,” Swartzwelder said. “The point is if you're in Act 47 and everybody is under those mandates, they should be uniformly applied.”

Mayor Bill Peduto's Office said the contract conforms to a five-year fiscal plan crafted in 2014 by state financial overseers.

The state's Commonwealth Court last year agreed and denied the union's request to void the contract. The Supreme Court will hear arguments about whether Commonwealth Court erred in ruling the contract does not deviate from the Act 47 plan, according to an order issued by the court.

“The city believes Commonwealth Court's decision was correct,” said Tim McNulty, a spokesman for Peduto. “While Pittsburgh has made substantial progress in getting its financial house in order, it continues to address long-term legacy costs, including its significant pension liabilities.”

Pittsburgh officers for years have noted that they earn less in salary and benefits than suburban officers.

The union and city have been battling over contract terms since the last one expired in December 2014. Union officials opted to have a panel of three arbitrators write a contract after negotiations stalled.

FOP officials complained that the panel awarded other city unions raises of 2 percent from 2016 through 2018 while the police contract calls for a 1 percent raise in 2016 and 2 percent in 2017 and 2018. Officers also have to pay 15 percent of health insurance premiums, up from 8.8 percent in the previous contract.

A first-year Pittsburgh officer earns $44,710 a year in base salary, a figure that does not include overtime pay. In some cases, officers can more than double their salary working overtime.

Master officers with more than four years of service draw a salary of $66,741 a year, according to the city's 2018 budget.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312, bbauder@tribweb.com or via Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me