ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Pittsburgh police: Men steal SUV from Downtown valet stand, crash in Homewood

Megan Guza
| Monday, April 16, 2018, 11:15 a.m.

Two Pittsburgh men accused of stealing an SUV from a Downtown valet stand allegedly tried to elude police early Monday but crashed the vehicle and confessed to the theft, authorities said.

Officers patrolling the city's Homewood section about 2:45 a.m. spotted the SUV, which had been reported stolen earlier in the night from the valet stand of a Downtown hotel, according to Public Safety spokesman Chris Togneri.

When officers attempted to pull over the vehicle, the driver tried to get away but immediately crashed on Frankstown Avenue, Togneri said. The two men were initially stuck in the SUV because the door was resting against a wall.

Although police said the pursuit was short-lived, they intend to charge the alleged driver — later identified as John Van Allen, 20, of the city's Lincoln-Lemington neighborhood — with attempting to flee.

Van Allen and passenger Tyrese Sittler, 19, of Perry South admitted to stealing the SUV, Togneri said. Officers found a gun in vehicle, according to Togneri.

Van Allen is charged with theft, receiving stolen property, firearms violations, conspiracy and fleeing police. Sittler is charged with theft and conspiracy.

No officers or bystanders were injured.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me