ShareThis Page

Oyler: Bridgeville's most famous cold case explored

| Friday, Oct. 20, 2017, 11:00 p.m.

For its October “Second Tuesday” workshop, the Bridgeville Area Historical Society interrupted its study of the history of Bridgeville High School to focus on the community's most famous “cold case,” the murder of Pennsylvania Railroad Station Agent John C. F. Franks attempting to prevent a robbery 102 years ago.

On a peaceful Saturday evening, Oct. 16, 1915, a pair of strangers were loitering in the vicinity of the station when the whistle of the 8 o'clock passenger train from Pittsburgh announced its imminent arrival.

At this point, Station Agent Franks came out of the station, probably to determine if the train's conductor had any mail for him. The two strangers entered the building. The westbound train pulled to a stop, blocking the crossing, and discharged its passengers, some of whom proceeded up Station Street toward Washington Avenue. A dozen or so waited patiently for the train to pull out.

At this point, Mr. Franks realized that something was wrong and hurried back into the station, where he found one of the strangers rifling his cash box. He immediately attacked him and fell to the floor on top of him. In the meantime the passenger train and left, but before the passengers could get across the crossing an eastbound freight appeared, preventing them.

Two young boys dashed across the tracks in front of the freight and found themselves in the middle of a confrontation. The stranger standing guard at the station door grabbed 14-year-old John Schulte, threw him on the floor, then proceeded to shoot Mr. Franks and rescue his partner. Franks was mortally wounded. Walter Der, 13, observed this from the platform.

By the time the freight train had passed, and the passengers had come rushing across to investigate, the two burglars were leaving the station. The shocked passengers found Mr. Franks' dead body close to the ticket office he had tried to defend.

As soon as news of this tragedy spread, sightings of suspicious characters began to come in from all directions. A futile manhunt, supported with bloodhounds, focused on the area south of Bridgeville.

A careful search of old newspaper articles related to this event turned up a list of 14 suspects, two of whom didn't surface until 1934. The facilitator carefully reported all the available clues to the audience, as well as the fact that none of these men was ever formally indicted.

Based on this knowledge, he now asked the workshop attendees to come to their own conclusions and decide whom they thought was guilty. Suspect John Mokati, possibly allied with William Sanders, got the most votes, followed closely by “I haven't a clue.”

It is a remarkably convoluted story, one that doesn't paint a favorable picture of the County Detective Department in that era.

The next “Second Tuesday” workshop will return to our review of the history of Bridgeville High School, picking up with the Class of 1939. We hope to get as far as 1942 or 1943. It will be at the History Center at 7 p.m. Nov. 14.

John Oyler is a Tribune-Review contributing writer. Reach him at 412-343-1652 or joylerpa@icloud.com. Read more from him at mywutb.blogspot.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.