ShareThis Page

Carnegie public hearing set Nov. 6 for proposed zoning changing

| Tuesday, Oct. 31, 2017, 5:09 p.m.

Carnegie officials will hold a public hearing at 5:30 p.m. Nov. 6 in regard to proposed changes to the zoning ordinance that have been in the works for several years.

Borough officials say the zoning ordinance being utilized was approved in 1983, with minor revisions made throughout the years.

“With all of the progress that Carnegie has achieved to date, it is now time to begin putting guidelines and options in place for the municipality to keep steering our success in the right direction,” said borough manager Steve Beuter.

During the October council meeting, Councilman Rich D'Loss said the updates primarily focus on the business district.

What is now designated as the C-1 (commercial) zoning area will be divided into three downtown districts: D-1 (downtown), D-2 (cultural) and D-3 (arterial).

“The proposed zoning ordinance is designed to help our community grow and solidify our downtown area,” Carnegie Mayor Jack Kobistek said at council's October meeting.

In addition to updating the zoning districts, officials plan to upgrade the signage ordinance that would provide a more uniform look throughout the borough and would offer businesses more options for what they are permitted to use.

Councilman Phil Boyd said the county already reviewed the borough's proposed zoning ordinance and suggested minor revisions.

The zoning ordinance is 193 pages and can be found on the borough's website.

Jim Spezialetti is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.