ShareThis Page

Shady Side Academy students win congressional app challenge

Tawnya Panizzi
| Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017, 12:33 p.m.
Shady Side Academy freshman Nick Zana, senior Fuad Youssef, junior Peter Wang and senior Henry Friedlander at the PA District 14 Congressional App Challenge Awards reception on Dec. 4.
submitted
Shady Side Academy freshman Nick Zana, senior Fuad Youssef, junior Peter Wang and senior Henry Friedlander at the PA District 14 Congressional App Challenge Awards reception on Dec. 4.

Updated 19 hours ago

Shady Side Academy Senior School students who developed the “SSA Student” mobile app won the 2017 Congressional App Challenge on Monday for Pennsylvania's 14th Congressional District.

Seniors Henry Friedlander and Fuad Youssef, junior Peter Wang and freshman Nick Zana were honored at an awards reception hosted by U.S. Rep. Mike Doyle at the University of Pittsburgh's Alumni Hall. SSA Computer Science Department Chair John Wizzard accompanied the student developers.

As the winning app from this district, it will be displayed on the Congressional App Challenge website and in the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

Friedlander said the digital planner helps students manage and share class schedules, making it more simple for friends to meet up, schedule tutoring with teachers and review daily activities.

They can also look at lunch menus and pay for their meals at the dining hall.

The SSA Student app was launched this fall and quickly became a must-have, school spokeswoman Jen Roupe said.

The Congressional App Challenge aims to encourage students to learn how to code and is intended to highlight the value of computer science and STEM education.

Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. Reach her at 412-782-2121, ext. 2.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.