ShareThis Page

Gateway grandfathers in old food if new storage policy is adopted

Dillon Carr
| Monday, Aug. 21, 2017, 11:00 p.m.

If the Gateway school board ends up adopting a policy reducing the amount of time food can be kept in storage, it won't require already purchased goods to be thrown out.

That amendment to the proposal, currently on 30-day public notice, will save the district from having to throw away tens of thousands of dollars worth of food once the policy is adopted, according to Food Director Martin Lorenzo.

The policy being considered would reduce the shelf life of frozen meats and dry goods from three years to one, and cheese from one year to six months.

During an early August study session, Lorenzo warned that he would have to throw a lot of food out if the policy is adopted.

Because he has the storage space, Lorenzo said he uses the U.S. Department of Agriculture's surplus commodity foods program to buy in bulk at low prices — from 50 to 100 percent less than wholesale — for roughly 15 to 20 percent of the district's food.

He would not be able to use the program and would be forced to buy smaller amounts at wholesale prices if the board reduces how long food can be stored before being thrown away, he said.

After a meeting last week, Lorenzo said he will have to adjust accordingly if the food policy is adopted.

“It's going to be more of a challenge, but we'll find a way,” he said.

Before voting, board member John Ritter – a strong opponent to the food policy revision – appealed to the public to weigh in on the matter by emailing or calling board members and administrators during the period the proposed policy is on public display.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.