ShareThis Page

Letter to the editor: Keep Gateway equity director part-time for now

| Monday, Oct. 16, 2017, 11:00 p.m.

To the editor:

The Gateway school board recently hired an equity director. I wish to congratulate the board for its recognition that African-American students may not be achieving as well as other groups in our multi-ethnic community.

As the board knows, this has been a national concern for some time, and the issue has been extensively studied. Thoughtful people understand that we are dealing with a complex problem, and one with no easy solutions.

Education itself is a complex process involving students, parents, teachers, schools and the community — all of which contribute to student achievement in our schools. Therefore, I think it is incumbent on all participants in the process to develop clear ideas as to:

1. The nature of the problem, with clear definitions.

2. How to choose from proposed strategies that have been validated to be effective by rigorous research in order to deal with the situation.

3. The desired outcomes, and criteria against which to judge progress.

Until there is greater clarity as to the voluminous job description, expected performance criteria, and proposed evaluation of outcomes, it is premature to demand this new position be funded at a full-time level.

Louis A. Chandler


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.