ShareThis Page

5 cases filed in Judge Herbst's Monroeville office

Michael DiVittorio
| Friday, Oct. 20, 2017, 3:27 p.m.

Monroeville police recently filed the following charges in District Judge Jeffrey L. Herbst's office:

• Jason Beatty, 28, of North Versailles is charged with possession of a small amount of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia and driving with a suspended license. Charges were filed Oct. 13 in connection with an incident along the 3900 block of Monroeville Boulevard.

• Daulton Barnhart, 21, of Turtle Creek is charged with possession of controlled substances, driving without a license and driving an unregistered vehicle. Charges were filed Oct. 13 in connection with an incident along the 3800 block of Northern Pike.

• Melvin Palmer III, 22, of Pittsburgh is charged with driving with a suspended license, accident involving damage to attended vehicle or property and failure to yield to right-of-way while turning left. Charges were filed Oct. 17 in connection with an incident along the 4000 block of Monroeville Boulevard.

• Maxwell Timothy McNeillie, 29, of Plum is charged with theft by deception, receiving stolen property and criminal conspiracy. Charges were filed Oct. 17 in connection with an incident along the 3600 block of William Penn Highway.

• Amanda Lynne Varsafsky, 30, of Jeannette is charged with receiving stolen property, criminal conspiracy and retail theft. Charges were filed Oct. 17 in connection with an incident along the 3600 block of William Penn Highway.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.