ShareThis Page

Geokinetics challenges Monroeville's seismic testing regulations in court

Dillon Carr
| Tuesday, Oct. 24, 2017, 4:06 p.m.
An Apex Energy drilling-rig operation above homes off of Possum Hollow Road in Hempfield on Wednesday July 5, 2017.
Christian Tyler Randolph | Tribune-Review
An Apex Energy drilling-rig operation above homes off of Possum Hollow Road in Hempfield on Wednesday July 5, 2017.

A company hired to do seismic testing in Monroeville is challenging the municipality's recently enacted laws regulating the practice, which is often a precursor to Marcellus shale drilling.

Monroeville Council voted unanimously last month to pass a law that regulates seismic testing by requiring companies to pay $1,000 to obtain a permit, notify nearby property owners in advance of testing and obtain a $2 million liability insurance policy.

The testing firm, Geokinetics, in a complaint filed Oct. 11 in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh, said the regulations were passed for political reasons and is asking a judge to strike them down.

“Monroeville's intransigence is not motivated by any legitimate concerns for the health and safety of its citizens, but rather by its council's concerns about November elections,” the complaint said.

Only two Monroeville incumbents — Linda Gaydos and Thomas Wilson, both Democrats — are in contested races in the Nov. 7 election. It's a seven-member council.

“It had nothing to do with my election, and it certainly wasn't for political gain,” Gaydos said about voting for the regulations that are being challenged. “Our job is to look out for our residents and follow directions of what they want.”

The regulations came after complaints that started during meetings in July from residents questioning the safety and other issues related to seismic testing and fracking. Adrienne Weiss, who has lived in Monroeville for 16 years, was one of the residents against development of gas wells.

“They want free reign for whatever they want to do,” Weiss said about gas well developers. “And that's typical. They don't care if (drilling occurs) on indigenous lands, if it hurts the rivers. ... I would like for the whole fracking industry to just go away.”

Monroeville oil and gas exploration company Huntley & Huntley hired Texas-based Geokinetics this year to do seismic testing in a 200-square-mile radius that includes Allegheny and Westmoreland counties. Huntley & Huntley officials have said they do not have plans for hydraulic fracturing operations in Monroeville, but seismic testing would help the company determine if drilling operations are viable in areas bordering the municipality.

The complaint, filed by attorney Kevin Gormly of the energy law firm Steptoe & Johnson, which operates in six states including Pennsylvania, also argues Geokinetics should not be bound by the regulations because the company had applied for a permit before the ordinance was adopted.

“An ordinance does not apply retroactively when it was not in effect or pending at the time of the filing of the application,” the complaint said. “The ordinance effectively prohibits seismic testing in Monroeville through arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable regulations.”

Geokinetics, in the complaint, emphasizes that seismic testing is a safe process. The testing involves setting off a small explosive charge in a shallow hole and then charting the sound waves as they travel through the earth, according to industry experts. Geophysicists can analyze that data to predict where there might be gas trapped in significant quantities to warrant exploration.

Monroeville Manager Tim Little said the municipality cannot comment on the lawsuit. Monroeville's solicitor, Robert Wratcher, did not immediately respond to a call and email seeking comment.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, dcarr@tribweb.com or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.