ShareThis Page

Drugs and thefts among crimes addressed in Monroeville court

Michael DiVittorio
| Friday, Nov. 3, 2017, 2:51 p.m.

Monroeville District Court Judge Jeffrey Herbst handled these cases recently. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. Charges were filed by Monroeville police.

Held for court

• Daniel Tamas, 34, address not available, on charges of access devices used to obtain property or service, conspiracy and 14 counts of access device fraud. The charges were filed Nov. 13, 2016.

• Alyssa Bihary, 24, of Pittsburgh on charges of retail theft and possession of drug paraphernalia. The charges were filed Sept. 19.

• Brianna Frederick, 23, of Washington on charges of retail theft, corruption of minors and conspiracy. The charges were filed Sept. 28, 2014.

Waived hearings

• Richard Wade, 29, of Pittsburgh on charges of fleeing or attempting to elude officers, possession with intent to deliver, possession of controlled substances, possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, driving with a suspended license, reckless driving, careless driving, turning movements and required signals, disregard traffic lane, tampering with physical evidence and recklessly endangering another person. The charges were filed June 27.

• Sharon Margaret Lepore, 45, of Pittsburgh on a charge of retail theft. The charge was filed May 5.

• Cody Robert Russ, 20, of Plum on charges of possession of controlled substances, public drunkenness and providing false identification to law enforcement. The charges were filed Aug. 5.

• Kenneth Mosley Jr., 48, of Pittsburgh on a charge of retail theft. The charge was filed Sept. 25.

• Greggory James Young, 33, of Monroeville on charges of corruption of minors, two counts of indecent assault on a person less than 13 years of age and two counts of endangering the welfare of children.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.