ShareThis Page

Allegheny County pulls plug on donation of Tasers to Gateway School District

Dillon Carr
| Thursday, Nov. 30, 2017, 1:00 p.m.
An X26 Taser. AP PHOTO.
An X26 Taser. AP PHOTO.
Gateway School Board members at an Aug. 15 meeting.
Dillon Carr | Tribune-Review
Gateway School Board members at an Aug. 15 meeting.

Gateway School District won't be getting a donation of 18 used Tasers it had been expecting from Allegheny County.

Allegheny County Council in September introduced but never voted on a resolution to give the Tasers to Gateway. The Tasers became available when the county sheriff's office got newer models to replace them. The Gateway school board voted to accept the donation, even though it had never been approved by council.

Now, Councilman Nick Futules says the legislation approving the donation is likely to die without getting a vote.

“They must be out of their minds for wanting them knowing they're obsolete — just to save money at the expense of someone's life?” said Futules, chairman of the council's education committee.

Futules said his staff found media reports that uncovered a number of wrongful death lawsuits filed against Axon Enterprise, formerly Taser International, the company that manufactures the X26 model the sheriff's office is replacing.

The articles in a series by Reuters said there were more than 1,000 deaths and 435 wrongful death lawsuits involving use of Tasers from 1983 through July filed against police forces and municipalities. Of those cases, 128 named Taser International as a defendant. Of the deaths, 26 occurred in Pennsylvania and six were in Allegheny County, according to the Reuters investigation.

In an effort to get the stalled county legislation back on the table for a vote, Gateway school board members Nov. 21 voted to send the council a letter saying the district would assume all liability for the use of Tasers once they were donated.

But Futules said liability is not the issue.

“We have members of council, and I'm one of them, who don't think we should be giving a product to the school district that is obsolete and could be dangerous,” Futules said. “I wouldn't want that resting on my shoulders.”

School board Director Mary Beth Cirucci said she is disappointed that the Tasers shelved in February aren't going to be donated to the district. The Tasers would have been used by 12 officers on the district's recently created police force. The remaining six would have been placed in storage until more officers were hired.

“It is a shame that because of government red tape, the taxpayers never benefited and the then-fully functional Tasers sat for 10 months and are still sitting there,” Cirucci said via email. “We were trying to save Gateway taxpayers a significant amount of money on a product that is still actively used throughout the country today.”

Cirucci noted in her email that Monroeville police are among those using the X26 Taser. But police Chief Doug Cole said the 50 units his department has will start being phased out and replaced by newer models in January.

“The old ones are no longer supported by Axon, so they're not making parts for them. If I send them in for repair, they won't repair them anymore,” Cole said.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, dcarr@tribweb.com or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.