ShareThis Page
Monroeville

Gateway student accused of threats to teachers charged by Monroeville police

Dillon Carr
| Thursday, Feb. 22, 2018, 5:33 p.m.
Gateway High School
Gateway High School

A Gateway High School student has been charged for a threat against teachers he allegedly made on Feb. 15.

Vincent Owen, 18, was arrested by Monroeville police at the school and charged the misdemeanor making terroristic threats.

Owen posted a vulgar message on social media that said he was angry at teachers for disrespecting him.

“Look what … happened in Florida,” the message read.

The message was posted the a popular image-sharing app, said Tim Skoog, the assistant director of the Gateway police force.

He said students and high school staff alerted administration about the threat 30 minutes before classes started on Feb. 16.

“Owen admitted to posting the threat on social media because he felt he was being disrespected by the teachers at the school. Owen also made statements about hurting himself when he felt angry,” the criminal complaint said.

Officers found no weapons when they searched Owen's home to see if he had “any means to carry out a mass casualty,” the complaint said.

A preliminary hearing has been scheduled for April 30 before Monroeville District Judge Jeffrey Herbst.

Superintendent Bill Short and Monroeville police Chief Doug Cole did not respond to requests for comment.

The incident happened two days after a former student at a Florida high school killed 17 people and injured several others.

At least 12 schools in the Greater Pittsburgh area have reported and investigated threats to students or teachers in the week following the shooting in Florida. Even in the absence of a threat, many others have stepped up police presence in school buildings and tightened security procedures.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me