ShareThis Page

Leash-law update back on Wednesday's Murrysville council agenda

| Monday, July 17, 2017, 10:21 a.m.
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Murrysville officials have been working to update their existing leash laws for municipal parks since the spring.

A potential vote on updated leash laws in Murrysville's public parks will be back on the agenda for the third time on Wednesday evening.

The past two meetings, not enough council members have been present to garner four votes in favor of the updated ordinance, whose latest version proposes:

• Requiring all dogs outside the dog park to be on a leash of no more than 8 feet;

• Allowing dogs to run off-leash from dawn to 3 p.m. in Townsend and Pleasant Valley Parks;

• Barring dogs and other pets from playing field areas;

• Requiring owners to display tags indicating that their pet is licensed and vaccinated.

• Raising fines to $100 for a first violation, $300 for the second and $500 for each subsequent violation.

Every neighboring community, as well as Westmoreland County, has some form of leash law in place.

Here is how some communities throughout the country are dealing with the issue:

• Utah: “ Park City authorities crack down on dog leash laws ” (Good4Utah.com)

• Colorado: “ Debate over Wash Park leash laws ” (KDVR-Fox 31)

• Massachusetts: “ Hingham eases leash law at Bare Cove Park ” (Boston Globe)

• California: “ Dog owners unhappy about tight leash proposals for Bay Area parks ” (KTVU-Fox 2)

Murrysville council's July 19 meeting will be at 7 p.m. in the municipal building, 4100 Sardis Road.

Patrick Varine is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. He can be reached at 724-850-2862, pvarine@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.