ShareThis Page
Murrysville

Franklin Regional sets additional public forum to discuss Sloan 'elementary campus' project

Patrick Varine
| Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2018, 5:03 p.m.
Above, VEBH Architects' rendering of the front of the new Sloan Elementary School.
VEBH Architects
Above, VEBH Architects' rendering of the front of the new Sloan Elementary School.

Franklin Regional officials will host a March 12 public forum to discuss with residents the proposed Sloan elementary campus project, school board president Dr. Larry Borland announced at Monday night's board meeting.

Many of the same residents who spoke at the board's previous meeting returned on Monday, and the vast majority of the meeting was spent discussing the roughly $54 million project, which would consolidate all of the district's elementary students on one campus. Sloan Elementary would serve students in kindergarten through second grade, with grades 3 to 5 attending a newly built school on the Sloan campus's 98 acres.

The March 12 public forum will be from 6 to 8 p.m. at the cafeteria in Franklin Regional Senior High School, 3200 School Road in Murrysville. The board and administration held a series of presentations and town-hall meetings in the months leading up to their decision to begin moving ahead with the project.

The district has dedicated a full section of its website to construction and renovation projects, including documents, architectural renderings, the full feasibility study outlining the need for up to $97 million in renovation and repair work over the next decade, and even a video showing congestion at the main school campus when parents arrive.

The board's next meeting will be Feb. 12, 7:30 p.m. at the Murrysville municipal building at 4100 Sardis Road.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2862, pvarine@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me