ShareThis Page
Murrysville

Franklin Regional school board questioned for discussing safety issues in private

Patrick Varine
| Wednesday, June 6, 2018, 5:40 p.m.

At a time when school security is a nationwide topic and some five dozen threats have been made locally since the Parkland, Fla., school shooting in February, a former Franklin Regional school board member believes the current school board is holding too many security discussions behind closed doors.

“You've gotten no input from the public about this,” said Dick Kearns of Murrysville, former school board president, about the board's recent vote to begin establishing an internal police force. “You deliberated about it privately, you come out and announce that you're going to establish a police force, and we're going to have to pay for it.”

The board voted unanimously in late May to petition the Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas, with the goal of creating a three-person department consisting of an officer, a supervisor in charge and an assistant supervisor in charge.

Getting court permission is the first step, and there is no fixed timeline for starting such a force or a full financial picture yet for what it could cost, school district spokeswoman Cara Zanella said.

Kearns at this week's board meeting cited an excerpt from the state's Sunshine Act, which lays out the eligible topics for an executive session. He accused the board of violating the law by discussing security in private.

Creating a police force was not listed on the board's May committee-of-the-whole agenda — where items slated for action at a later voting meeting are typically announced and discussed publicly. The topic was added to the May 21 agenda during the meeting.

School board solicitor Gary Matta told Kearns he believed the board had acted properly.

“If you believe we have acted outside of the law, do what you feel is necessary,” Matta said. “But what I'm saying is that this board is acting for the safety of the children in this district.”

Matta did not return several calls seeking comment.

In making the customary executive-session announcement prior to recent meetings, school board President Dr. Larry Borland has cited “security” among items to be discussed.

Melissa Melewsky, a lawyer for the Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association, said the state Sunshine Act does not include an exemption for security.

“But even if there was a security exemption, it should not apply to a discussion about whether to create a new staff security position within the school system,” Melewsky said. “School security officers operate in the open and are highly visible, with good reason.”

She said the creation of a new staff position “is one that must be addressed in public, with an opportunity for the public to weigh in before the decision is made.”

If a county judge grants the district's petition to empower and create a police force, subsequent discussion about specific candidates for those positions could be held during an executive session, Melewsky said.

Pending state legislation would add security to the list of topics eligible for an executive session. The bill introduced by Sen. Joe Scarnati passed the state Senate unanimously in April and is in the House State Government committee.

Many schools in Pennsylvania are looking for ways to better protect those in their care, including identifying potential weaknesses in their current safety plans, Scarnati said. Making those plans public, he said, could compromise school safety efforts and put students in harm's way. He added that more than half of U.S. states have laws allowing security and safety matters to be discussed in executive session.

Since February, around 60 threats have been made against schools, students or teachers in southwest Pennsylvania. At least 14 juveniles across the region, ages 12 to 17, face terroristic threats charges in connection with investigations into those cases.

In 2014, Alex Hribal attacked fellow Franklin Regional High School students with kitchen knives, injuring 21 people. He was sentenced this year to serve up to 60 years in prison.

School board member Gregg Neavin said the board has discussed various options with regard to its security plan. He did not elaborate.

“There are details that you just don't share,” he said. “This one came up and was added (to the May 21 agenda) as new business because of the process that we need to go through.”

With no July meeting, Neavin said, board officials had “certain marks to hit” in order to potentially have an internal police force in place for the start of the 2018-19 school year.

“With this kind of issue, I would hate like heck to be in a Monday-morning quarterback position,” he said.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2862, pvarine@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MurrysvilleStar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me