ShareThis Page

Death of newly elected Pine-Richland School Board member stuns friends, colleagues

| Monday, Dec. 4, 2017, 11:42 a.m.
Robert Pavlecic
Robert Pavlecic

Gibsonia's Robert Pavlecic, 60, who was recently elected to the Pine-Richland school board and was about to begin serving his first term, passed away on Thursday.

The McKeesport High School graduate and behavioral health professional for more than 30 years is survived by family, including his wife of 25 years, Laura Swiderski Pavlecic, and their children, Jacob and Samantha Pavlecic.

Pavlecic and his wife were active in the Richland Township Democratic Committee for the past 10 years.

Brian O'Malley, chair of the local chapter, said on Friday evening that the members of the committee were saddened to hear of the passing of their friend.

“Our thoughts and hearts go out to his wife Laura, our vice-chair, and his children, Jake and Sammi,” O'Malley said. “He was a great man, husband and father. Most of all we will miss his smile, friendship, generosity and humor. We are also sad that the Pine-Richland community won't get a chance to see him make his mark on our school board.”

Pavlecic graduated from Allegheny College and earned his master's in community mental health from Trinity College and a masters in education from Chatham University. An avid Pirates and Penguins fan, Pavlecic was a member of Guardian Angel CFU Lodge in Etna. Monday night's school board meeting was to be his first.

A post on Pavlecic's school board candidacy page on Facebook posted after the November election reads, “So, the votes are in and we won 644-554 based on the posted results! Thank you so much to everyone who came out and supported me, I am truly grateful for this opportunity and look forward to serving the people and students of Pine-Richland!! Also, congratulations to Carla Meyer on her win, I look forward to serving with her on the PR board!”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.