ShareThis Page

School board winners in North Hills, North Allegheny sworn into office

Tony LaRussa
| Thursday, Dec. 7, 2017, 2:57 p.m.
Allison Mathis
Allison Mathis
Sandra Kozera
Sandra Kozera
Kathy Reid
Kathy Reid
Annette Giovengo Nolish
Annette Giovengo Nolish
Andrew Chomos
Andrew Chomos
Allyson Minton
Allyson Minton
Richard McClure
Richard McClure
Scott Russell
Scott Russell

The North Hills and North Allegheny school boards held reorganization meetings this week to swear in candidates elected in November.

Allison Mathis and Sandra Kozera, who won their first four-year terms on the North Hills school board, were administered the oath of office by District Judge Richard Opiela on Monday, Dec. 4.

Also sworn in at the annual board reorganization meeting were re-elected incumbent board members Kathy Reid and Annette Giovengo Nolish.

Newly elected North Allegheny school board members Andrew Chomos and Allyson Minton were sworn into office at the board's annual reorganization meeting on Dec. 6.

The oath of office was administered by District Judge William Wagner. Also sworn in were incumbent board members Richard McClure and Scott Russell.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-772-6368 or tlarussa@tribweb.com or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.