ShareThis Page
North Hills

Letter to the editor: North Hills needs to make parents part of school security conversation

| Wednesday, March 21, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

Regarding the article Some North Hills parents unhappy with district response to security concerns , I believe parents are an essential element of school security and I strongly advise the superintendent to take notice and invite them into the conversation.

Furthermore, he should consult with the experts before it is too late, because the shadow of failure lingers a lifetime.

Academia in general is often reluctant to take on the responsibilities of adequate security measures because they just don't know. And they don't necessarily care for others making transparent decisions in their arena that are not academics like themselves.

I believe they would rather pay themselves large salaries and forgo the security measures necessary to secure a safe environment for their students, as they assume they know better than the parents and security experts.

The facts speak for themselves — school violence is accelerating and the academics do far too little to prevent these tragedies, and when they do occur, they never accept responsibility.

Tony Laush

(Laush, a 1972 graduate of North Hills High School, is a retired Pittsburgh police sergeant. He now works as a police chief for the U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs.)

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me