ShareThis Page

Nine cases handled in Penn Hills District Court

Dillon Carr
| Friday, Sept. 29, 2017, 11:09 a.m.

District Court Judge Anthony DeLuca handled these cases recently filed by Penn Hills police. Defendants will have court dates set in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas.

• Chance McIver, 24, of Penn Hills was charged with possession of drugs with intent to deliver, possession of drugs, resisting arrest, driving while privilege is suspended or revoked, tampering with evidence and other traffic infractions in connection with a Sept. 11 incident.

• Darryl Keen, 46, of Penn Hills, was charged with resisting arrest and escape in connection with a Sept. 12 incident.

• Deante Brown, 20, of Penn Hills, and Nariah A. Potter, 19, of Baldwin were charged with simple assault and harassment in connection with a Sept. 12 incident.

• Nicholas Kelly, 22, of Penn Hills was charged with possession of drugs, possession with intent to deliver, delivery of drugs, carrying a firearm without a license and receiving stolen property in connection with a Sept. 12 incident.

• Brock Dezi, 21, of Penn Hills was charged with criminal conspiracy, possession of drugs, possession with intent to deliver, receiving stolen property and carrying a firearm without a license in connection with a Sept. 12 incident.

• Deborah McAllister-John, 60, of Penn Hills was charged with simple assault and harassment in connection with a Sept. 12 incident.

• Jamir Atkins, 18, of Penn Hills was charged with simple assault and harassment in connection with a Sept. 15 incident.

• Jeremy M. Tabor, 37, of Penn Hills was charged with simple assault in connection with a Sept. 16 incident.

• Terry Roth, 30, of Penn Hills was charged with retail theft in connection with a Sept. 16 incident.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, dcarr@tribweb.com or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.