ShareThis Page
Penn Hills

Group fighting blight in Wilkinsburg expanding into Penn Hills

Dillon Carr
| Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2018, 3:21 p.m.
This house at 10743 Frankstown Road in Penn Hills was one of six slotted for demolition in September 2017.
Dillon Carr | Tribune-Review
This house at 10743 Frankstown Road in Penn Hills was one of six slotted for demolition in September 2017.

A Wilkinsburg nonprofit that restores homes plans to expand its work into Penn Hills.

The Pittsburgh Housing Development Association plans to acquire a house that is in bad shape in the municipality and make it livable for someone by spring, said the group's co-founder, Gregory Whitted.

“We would like to work with the residents and help with the problem of vacant properties and abandoned properties for useful purposes,” Whitted said.

Whitted would not identify where the property is until the association closes the sale. The property was made available through the National Community Stabilization Trust, a nonprofit in Washington, D.C., that helps governments and housing providers revitalize blighted neighborhoods.

The association has focused on restoring blighted houses in Wilkinsburg since 1982. Whitted said the nonprofit wants to expand into western Penn Hills to give more low-income families affordable housing options.

Penn Hills has a population of 42,329, according to the 2010 census. A Census Bureau estimate in 2016 showed 76 percent of its residents own their homes — a number higher than the state or national percentage. Whitted said those numbers indicate Penn Hills is in good shape when it comes to home ownership.

“But that doesn't mean there isn't blight that needs to be reclaimed,” he said. “There is a continuous need for housing stock, and that's what we're about. We want to protect the neighborhoods from blight.”

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me