ShareThis Page

Key Bank in Plum robbed Monday

| Monday, June 19, 2017, 2:33 p.m.
Plum police believe this bank surveillance photo shows Michael Moschetti, 39, of Jeannette. A warrant for his arrest for robbing the Key Bank in Plum on June 19, 2017, has been issued.

A man who made no effort to conceal his identity robbed the Key Bank along Route 286 in Plum at about 12:30 p.m. Monday, police and the FBI said.

The white man didn't wear a mask or otherwise conceal his face.

And authorities released a close-up photo of the alleged robber in the bank.

“He didn't display a weapon. He passed a note to the teller and said essentially to hand over money,” said Plum police Chief Jeff Armstrong.

Customers and tellers were in the bank at the time.

No one was injured.

The FBI said the robber appeared to be in his late 20s or early 30s. He is about 165 pounds and 6 feet tall with a dark goatee.

He has a tattoo on the right side of his neck and wore a golden earring.

The robber wore a dark ball cap, white athletic shorts, a dark blue, hooded sweatshirt.

Police don't know if the man drove from the scene or had an accomplice who drove a getaway car. He fled in an unknown direction.

The FBI and police are looking at surveillance video from nearby businesses in an effort to determine how the robber escaped.

Anyone with information about Monday's robbery is asked to call the FBI at 412-432-4000. Tipsters may remain anonymous.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.