ShareThis Page

New Plum school board dumps Center Elementary expansion plans

Michael DiVittorio
| Wednesday, Dec. 13, 2017, 4:00 p.m.
Center Elementary in Plum School District, Tuesday, July 25.
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Tribune-Review
Center Elementary in Plum School District, Tuesday, July 25.

Four new Plum school board members helped to quash a plan approved last month to add six classrooms to Center Elementary.

Three board members who were against the plan when it was approved were joined by the newcomers Tuesday in a 7-2 vote to rescind the action.

Voting to rescind the plan were board President Steve Schlauch, Vice President Vicky Roessler, Sue Caldwell and newly sworn-in members Scott Kolar, Angela Anderson, Brian Wisniewski and Scott Coulson. Richard Zucco and Jim Rogers dissented.

Zucco and Rogers voted for the expansion that was approved 6-3 in November. But among those board members who supported the project, three did not seek re-election and one was defeated in the November election. New board members were sworn-in at a Dec. 5 meeting.

"It's a real travesty," Zucco said. "I've said these things for years about trying to get something done here. I think a lot of the public understands it's just not going to happen, because we have people who just don't want to move forward on something for one reason of another."

One of the reasons for dumping the expansion plan is that enrollment projections the district based its decision to add classrooms on are too high and that the renovations won't be necessary, Schlauch said.

"If we can consolidate and redistrict without any additional building, and close old Holiday Park, we can save $1 million in the 2018-19 budget," Schlauch said. "Financially, and for the best interest of the school district, it makes sense to rescind it."

The Center expansion was part of an overall consolidation plan that would reduce the number of elementary schools from four to three and disperse those students equally to each building through redistricting. The plan would have closed the old Holiday Park building, where 250 Regency Elementary students have been housed for two years since that school was razed.

Little discussion about the plan was made during the meeting after the motion to rescind the expansion project was added to the agenda.

"I would like to look over the proposal again and make sure we're doing things properly and not wasting more money," Coulson said after the meeting.

Resident Tracy Riggins, who has a child attending Regency Elementary, said she was concerned a decision that took the previous board two years to make was being overturned so quickly.

"Is seven days really enough time to make an informed decision on what to do with our current funding situation?" she said.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367, mdivittorio@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.