ShareThis Page
Plum/Oakmont

Plum School District committee meeting postponed

Michael DiVittorio
| Monday, March 5, 2018, 2:00 p.m.
Plum School District.
Tribune-Review
Plum School District.

An education committee meeting to discuss the reconfiguration of Plum School District and placement of students for next school year has been rescheduled.

It will not take place at 6 p.m. March 13 at the high school.

Board President Steve Schlauch said the meeting was postponed a week from March 6 so administration had more time to prepare for a discussion of options outlined by Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials.

All choices include closing Regency Park Elementary School. Other possible decisions include:

• Redistricting among the three other elementary schools.

• Moving Regency students to Center, sixth grade to Oblock Junior High and eighth grade to the high school.

• Cutting full-day kindergarten to half-day and redistricting other students throughout the elementaries.

• Cutting full-day kindergarten to half-day and creating two K-4 schools and one 5-6 school out of the elementaries.

• Moving Regency students to Center and sixth grade to Oblock.

• Adding on to Center Elementary and moving Regency students there.

Acting Superintendent Gail Yamnitzky will have a presentation of the pros and cons of each option. District Business Manager John Zahorchak will highlight the cost of each move.

A vote on the choices could take place at the March 27 board meeting.

Facilities, safe schools, finance, transportation and policy committees will also meet March 13 after the education discussion.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367, mdivittorio@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me