ShareThis Page
Plum/Oakmont

Assault, drug cases recently handled by Plum District Judge Linda Zucco

Michael DiVittorio
| Thursday, June 7, 2018, 1:33 p.m.
Metrocreative

District Judge Linda Zucco recently handled the following cases. Charges filed by Plum police unless otherwise noted.

Held for court

• Bryant Zachery Myers, 24, of Natrona Heights on charges of possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, driving with a suspended license and operating a vehicle without a valid inspection. Oakmont police filed the charges March 7.

Waived preliminary hearings

• Michael Antellis, 52, of New Kensington on charges of aggravated assault, terroristic threats, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person and disorderly conduct. Charges were filed May 5.

• Kevin Duane Jackson, 22, of Pittsburgh on charges of possession of controlled substances and possession of drug paraphernalia. Charges were filed March 28.

• Christopher Labertew, 20, of Verona on charges of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse with a person less than 16 years of age, unlawful contact with a minor, statutory sexual assault, corruption of minors and indecent assault of a person less than 16 years old. Charges were filed April 10.

• Rachel Marie Mautino, 40, of Plum on charges of endangering the welfare of children and recklessly endangering another person. Charges were filed Feb. 23.

• Steven Matthew McIntyre, 32, of Indiana on charges of driving under the influence, failure to keep right, careless driving and reckless driving. Charges were filed Feb. 7.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me