Share This Page

Clarksburg woman sentenced to prison for robbery

| Tuesday, Nov. 29, 2016, 6:09 p.m.

An Indiana County woman was sentenced Tuesday to serve three to 10 years in prison for her role in a botched drug robbery attempt that left two men dead at an apartment in Indiana on May 10.

Catherine Hullenbaugh, 21, of Clarksburg, was among three people charged in connection with the shooting. She was sentenced by Judge William J. Martin after pleading guilty to reduced charges of criminal conspiracy to commit robbery.

She initially was charged with homicide in the deaths of Jamar Watt, 34, of Pittsburgh, and Shawn Richardson, 34, of Wilkinsburg, that police alleged occurred when the men attempted to rob a safe in the apartment of George C. Exum, 22, of Norristown, a former student at Indiana University of Pennsylvania. Investigators said the two victims went to Exum's apartment to buy marijuana when an argument ended in gunfire, police said. The shooting occurred outside Essex House on Oakland Avenue.

Exum and Consetta Menta, 28, of McKeesport, also were charged with homicide by borough police.

Homicide and aggravated assault charges were withdrawn against Exum, who still faces charges of tampering with physical evidence and manufacturing, delivery or possession with intent to delivery or manufacture drugs.

Both Exum and Menta, who pleaded guilty to robbery, will be sentenced Feb. 10. They remain in the county prison.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.